Drawing for RENOLIT CONTACT

USPTO serial 79023145

RENOLIT CONTACT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RENOLIT CONTACT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD L. SCHWAAB

David A. Copland Foley & Lardner LLP321 North Clark StreetSuite 2800Chicago, IL 60610

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Extruded plastic in the form of sheets, films or tubes for use in manufacturing; plastic films other than for packaging for general manufacturing use, semi processed plastic films for use in manufacturing protection films and signage films, plastic flexible films for manufacture of films for packaging, semi processed plastic films for use in manufacturing durable labels, semi processed plastic films for use in manufacturing stickersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 6, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 21, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 12, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 21, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 21, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 21, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 21, 2008OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 18, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2008IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Mar 5, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 4, 2008OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Mar 4, 2008OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Nov 16, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 1, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 30, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance