Drawing for STO+PFLEX

USPTO serial 79023164

STO+PFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3242714Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 15, 2007
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STO+PFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard J. Groos

Richard J. Groos King & Spalding LLP500 West 2nd Street, Suite 1800Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Common metals, namely steel, lead, magnesium, nickel, tin, titanium, zinc and their alloys; metal chains, metal ropes and metal hose fittings, namely a retaining system for pressure hosesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
017Non-metallic flexible pipes and pipe fittings not of metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
019[ Non-metallic rigid pipes for building ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 9, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 27, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 6, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 8, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 15, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 13, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 27, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 29, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 29, 2013C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 29, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 6, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 6, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 15, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 10, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 7, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 7, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance