Drawing for HETTICH INTERPACK

USPTO serial 79023183

HETTICH INTERPACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3272571Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 31, 2007
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HETTICH INTERPACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph D. Lewis

JOSEPH D LEWIS BARNES & THORNBURG LLP750 17TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006-4607UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006house mark for a full line of furniture fittings of metalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
020Furniture, drawers, furniture shelves, a house mark for a full line of furniture fittings not of metalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
039Packaging of goods for transportation, namely parts of furniture and furniture fittings; storage of goods, namely parts of furniture and furniture fittings; transport of furniture by rail, truck and airSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 1, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 1, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 24, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 20, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 20, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 7, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 7, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 27, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 26, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 15, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 13, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 13, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance