USPTO serial 79023191
SEMANTICINTEGRATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEMANTICINTEGRATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; pre-recorded magnetic data carriers, namely magnetic tape units and magnetic tapes featuring computer programs for data processing and magnetic data media featuring computer programs for enterprise software application integration in the field of knowledge management; data processors and computers; recorded and downloadable computer software for enterprise application integration in the field of knowledge management; computer operating systems | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Services comprising business management and business administration, namely, computerized file management, management of computerized files optimizing the search of computerized business files for third parties; services comprising business organization consultancy; organization of project management in the filed of electronic data processing; management and compilation of computerized databases, namely, the systemization of data in computer databases, the compilation of data in computer databases | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific research and technological research in the field of knowledge management; industrial analysis and research services in the field of knowledge management; design and development of computer hardware and software in the field of knowledge management | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |