Drawing for ROUTIN

USPTO serial 79023236

ROUTIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3252009Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 12, 2007
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ROUTIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jamie E. Platkin

Jamie E. Platkin Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032[Aerated waters, mineral waters; beers]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
033Wine, sparkling wines, hard cider, eaux-de-vie, liqueurs, distilled spiritsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 26, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 16, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 16, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 30, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 10, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 21, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 2, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2013C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 2, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 1, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 23, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2009RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 5, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 12, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 26, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 25, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance