Drawing for MILES

USPTO serial 79023242

MILES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH J ORLANDO

BUCKNAM & ARCHER1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576-1614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing for men, women and children, namely, sweaters, blouses, skirts, pullovers, shirts, trousers, morning coats and short coats, overcoats, hats, gloves, sashes for wear, stockings,socks, underclothing, bathing suits, belts, shoes, slippers and boots, knitwear, namely, aprons, belts, Bermuda, blouses, wind resistant jackets, boleros, bras, capes, chasubles, coats,costumes, dresses, dust coat, ear muffs, gloves, hats, hot pants, lady's suits, lingerie, nightdress, pants, poncho, pullovers, scarf, shorts, skirt, sleeping suits, socks, sweaters, t-shirts,ties, trousers, tunics, twin set, underwear, uniforms, vest, waist slip, waistcoats, overalls, body suits, cardigans, jacketsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 1, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2007DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 17, 2007CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 17, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 9, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2006CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jun 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance