USPTO serial 79023252
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maury M. Tepper, III (Christine S. Beaman, M. Christopher Bolen, Kathryn M. Eyster, Jack B. Hicks, Sarah Anne Keefe, Fang Liu, Jeffrey R. McFadden, C. Robert Rhodes, Randel S. Springer, Maury M. Tepper, III, Mitchell A. Tuchman)
Maury M. Tepper, III; Jacquelyn Austin, M. Christo Tepper & Eyster, PLLC3724 Benson DriveRaleigh, NC 27609UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations for the prevention and treatment of disorders of the nervous system, the immune system, the cardiovascular system including diabetes, the respiratory system, musculoskeletal and inflammatory disorders, or used in dermatology, oncology, hematology, transplantation and ophthalmology; pharmaceutical preparations used in gastroenterology and for the prevention and treatment of ocular disorders; anti-infective, antibiotic, antibacterial, anti-viral preparations, and pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of excessive mucous | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2012 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |