USPTO serial 79023322
MULTIQUICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3242717Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 15, 2007
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MULTIQUICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
Kronberg D-61476, DE
DE
Braun GmbH c/o Wella Aktiengesellschaft
DE
Other trademarks owned by Braun GmbH c/o Wella Aktiengesellschaft
IT
DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electrically operated kitchen utensils, namely, food processors, food mixers, food shredders, food slicers, [ knives, ] milling and mincing machines, meat mincers, dough kneading machines, blenders, food rasping machines, juice extractors, juicers, citrus presses, [ can openers, coffee grinders, flour mills, ] parts of the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Braun GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Braun GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Braun GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Braun GmbH c/o Wella Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by De? Longhi Appliances Srl.
- Other trademarks owned by Braun GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named MULTIQUICK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 25, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |