Drawing for FOODKEEPER

USPTO serial 79023327

FOODKEEPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3318479Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2007
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOODKEEPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Packaging machines, vacuum packaging machines, sealing machines for industrial purposes but excluding heat sealing machines and envelope sealing machines, sealing machines for packing but excluding heat sealing machines and envelope sealing machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
016Plastic sacks for wrapping, plastic sacks for vacuum wrapping, paper sacks for wrapping, plastic films for wrapping foods but not for commercial or industrial use, plastic films for vacuum wrapping but not for commercial or industrial useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Plastic vacuum containers for foodstuffs storage and being for domestic useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 28, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 10, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 13, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 13, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 30, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 27, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 25, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance