USPTO serial 79023340
PRIME DIRECTIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRIME DIRECTIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Food additives (terms too vague in the opinion of the International Bureau - rule 13;2b) of the Common Regulations); organic food additives (terms too vague in the opinion of the the International Bureau - rule 13;2b) of the Common Regulations); organic food additives comprising organically grown spirulina, whole organic grains (oats, wheat, barley, flaxseed and soy beans), barley malt, black strap molasses, organic grasses (green barley, green alfalfa and green wheat), whole organic sunflower kernels, whole pecan nuts, whole almonds, whole pepitas, organic brown rice, organic whole rye, organic whole maize, organic mung beans, organic whole millet, organic whole alfalfa seed, organic whole buckwheat, organic fresh ginger, lactobacilli (terms too vague in the opinion of the International Bureau - rule 13;2b) of the Common Regulations); pre-digested food additives (terms too vague in the opinion of the International Bureau - rule 13;2b) of the Common Regulations) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |