Drawing for BRIGHTHANDLE

USPTO serial 79023344

BRIGHTHANDLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRIGHTHANDLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shahrzad Poormosleh

HANSEN, TOM JÖRGEN KRANSELL & WENNBORG KBPO BOX 27834SE SE,

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Door handles and door knobs of metal, and ring-shaped fittings of metal; small items of metal hardware, namely, pulleys, springs and nuts; metal door guard safety chains; metal locks for doors; and metal doors and metal gates and parts therefore, namely door panels and door jambs of metal.SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Fire extinguishers, safety equipment in the nature of fire escape ladders, fire blankets and fire alarms; electronic and optically operated electronic door openers, door closers and locks; electronic security equipment for entrances, namely, electronic lock cylinders equipped with electronic readers for checking the identity of users.SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
020Wood and plastic handles and knobs for doors; and non-metal hose fittings.SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 7, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 13, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 11, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 15, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 21, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance