Drawing for HOYALUX ID CLIARC

USPTO serial 79023357

HOYALUX ID CLIARC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3194703Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 2, 2007
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOYALUX ID CLIARC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Grady K. Bergen

Grady K. Bergen Griggs Bergen LLP3131 McKinney Ave.Suite 600Dallas, TX 75204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Spectacle lenses; spectacle lens blanksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 22, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 24, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 4, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 15, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 14, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance