Drawing for CANARD-DUCHÊNE CHARLES VII

USPTO serial 79023418

CANARD-DUCHÊNE CHARLES VII

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3272573Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 31, 2007
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANARD-DUCHÊNE CHARLES VII?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUE10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines of French origin, namely champagneSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 20, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 12, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 28, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 30, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Aug 22, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 24, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 22, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 22, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 26, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 26, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 2, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 19, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 14, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance