Drawing for ERGOPLUS

USPTO serial 79023438

ERGOPLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3253947Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 19, 2007
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ERGOPLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leigh Ann Lindquist

Leigh Ann Lindquist Sughrue Mion, PLLC2100 Pennsylvania Ave., NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Asphalt paving machines, concrete paving machines and ground surface finishing machines, namely, road finishers and components of road finishersACTIVE—
009Electronic control systems for machines, namely, electronic control devices for road finishers and software belonging theretoACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 25, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 27, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 27, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 25, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 5, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 5, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 27, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 27, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 22, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 15, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance