Drawing for TRE 1130 K

USPTO serial 79023440

TRE 1130 K

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3385635Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 19, 2008
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRE 1130 K?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin P. Hoffman

Roberta S. Bren Stein IP LLC1400 Eye Street, N.W.Suite 300WASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicles, namely, motorized bicycles, motorcycles, motorized scooters, and parts and accessories of said products, namely, wheels, consoles, windscreens, mudguards, fitted vehicle body covers, tire chains, seat covers, windshield wipers, anti-theft alarms for vehicles, seat extenders, seat cushions, rear view mirrors, motorcycle kickstands, fitted exhaust covers, fenders, windshields, passenger grab bars, luggage bracket sets, topcases for storage, topcase brackets, topcase backrests, saddlebags, fitted carriers for traveling tank bags, tank bags, rear travel bags, luggage and topcases, fitted fuel tank covers, fitted control level covers, horns for vehicles, fitted motorcycle covers, turn signals for motorcycles, fitted head lamp protectors, fitted head lamp covers, fitted engine covers, tire pumpsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 26, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 26, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 19, 201471AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Feb 19, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 19, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 24, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 31, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 29, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 11, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 11, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 17, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2006IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Sep 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 21, 2006IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Aug 16, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance