Drawing for CORTEX

USPTO serial 79023461

CORTEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3318481Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2007
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORTEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

V. Schwartzmann

V. SCHWARTZMANN V. SCHWARTZMANN & ASSOCIATESPO BOX 1093COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for use in cardiopulmonary testing systems and in electrocardiogramsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
010Medical and diagnostic apparatus, namely ergospirometry systems and electrocardiogramsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific research for medical purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
044Medical analysis and clinical examinations in connection with medical attendance in the nature of cardiopulmonary and electrocardiogram examinations and for diagnosing cardiac, respiratory, circulatory and muscular diseasesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 11, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 3, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 13, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 13, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 30, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 30, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 25, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 9, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 5, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 16, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 6, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance