USPTO serial 79023472
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NL
Brand Loyalty Development B.V.
NL
L - founders of loyalty Group B.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by L - founders of loyalty Group B.V.
B.V. Koninklijke Van Kempen & Begeer
NL-2718 RK Zoetermeer, NL
Other trademarks owned by B.V. Koninklijke Van Kempen & Begeer
B.V. Koninklijke Van Kempen & Begeer
NL
Other trademarks owned by B.V. Koninklijke Van Kempen & Begeer
B.V. Koninklijke Van Kempen & Begeer
NL
Other trademarks owned by B.V. Koninklijke Van Kempen & Begeer
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cutlery, including cooks' knives [ and razors ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | Precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, namely, measuring spoons, cookware, carafes, casseroles, low casseroles, stockpots, saucepans, steamer sets, garlic crushers, salt and pepper mills, knife blocks, fruit bowls, storage jars and serving trays [ ; jewelry; precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments, namely, watches clocks and timers ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Non-precious metal household or kitchen utensils and containers, namely, bowls, cups, carafes, serving trays, dinner trays, [ trivets, ] squeeze bottles sold empty, storage jars; [ combs; ] pressed glass; glassware, namely, beverage glassware, bowls, cups, carafes, serving trays, dinner trays, squeeze bottles sold empty, storage jars; porcelain and earthenware, namely, bowls, [ cups, ] carafes [, serving trays, dinner trays, storage jars ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | [ Textiles and textile goods namely, towels, placemats, napkins, and tea towels; bed blankets and table cloths not of paper. ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 31, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |