USPTO serial 79023503
TANGO LILY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TANGO LILY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT P MICHAL
NOVAGRAAF NEDERLAND BV HOGEHILWEG 3POSTBUS 22722NL-1101 CA AMSTERDAM-ZUIDOOST,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely informational and educational materials regarding the care of plants and flowers; pamphlets, catalogues, announcement cards and greeting cards; packaging materials, namely bubble toil of plastic for packaging or for conditioning, sheets of reclaimed cellulose for wrapping, plastic film for wrapping, packing paper, viscose sheets for wrapping, bags, envelopes and pouches of paper or plastic for packaging, gift bags and wrapping paper | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | LIVE ORNAMENTAL PLANTS, NAMELY LILIES | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |