Drawing for Serial No. 79023532

USPTO serial 79023532

Serial No. 79023532

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3233701Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 24, 2007
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79023532?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert L. Titley

Robert L. Titley Quarles & Brady LLP411 East Wisconsin AvenueMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003General purpose abrasives in solid form, namely, coated abrasives and bonded abrasives in the form of [ plates, endless strips, ] discs [ sheet rolls, abrasive swabs, rods, bars, ] and wheels [ and hand blocks ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
007[ Machine parts, namely, abrasive grindstones and flap wheels being parts of machines ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
008[ Hand tools, namely, manually-operated grindstones ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 4, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 24, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 28, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 17, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
May 17, 2013C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 10, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 24, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 24, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 9, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 27, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 25, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance