USPTO serial 79023532
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert L. Titley
Robert L. Titley Quarles & Brady LLP411 East Wisconsin AvenueMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | General purpose abrasives in solid form, namely, coated abrasives and bonded abrasives in the form of [ plates, endless strips, ] discs [ sheet rolls, abrasive swabs, rods, bars, ] and wheels [ and hand blocks ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | [ Machine parts, namely, abrasive grindstones and flap wheels being parts of machines ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | [ Hand tools, namely, manually-operated grindstones ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 10, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 25, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |