Drawing for ACEITES NTRA SRA. DEL CARMEN LA REVOLUCIÓN GASTRONÓMICA CNSC

USPTO serial 79023555

ACEITES NTRA SRA. DEL CARMEN LA REVOLUCIÓN GASTRONÓMICA CNSC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACEITES NTRA SRA. DEL CARMEN LA REVOLUCIÓN GASTRONÓMICA CNSC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Extra virgin olive oilSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Services of import and export of extra virgin olive oilSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
039Services of warehousing, storage, transport and distribution of extra virgin olive oilSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 20, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 19, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 28, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 28, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance