USPTO serial 79023594
SENSEAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3527648Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 2008
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SENSEAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
HOWARD N. ARONSON Lackenbach Siegel LLP1 Chase RoadLackenbach Siegel BuildingSCARSDALE, NY 10583-4156Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific, electrical and optical apparatus and instruments for air improvement, namely, gas sensors, gas monitors, gas meters and radio transmitters for transmitting detected gas values [ ; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images; blank magnetic data carriers; data processors and computers ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |