Drawing for HI

USPTO serial 79023599

HI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3302768Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 2, 2007
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter S. Sloane

Peter S. Sloane Leason Ellis LLPOne Barker Avenue, Fifth FloorWhite Plains, NY 10601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Integrated circuit cards, namely, smart cards with integrated circuits; Computer software, namely, communications software for connecting global computer networks, computer software for controlling access server applications, computer software for controlling the computer hardware contained within self-service terminals, computer software for administration of computer local area networks, and computer software for application and database integration; Optical communication apparatus, namely, optical line terminal for use in receiving, transmitting and analyzing the optical signal, optical network unit, also known as an optical line terminal which manages the optical networks, for use in the telecommunications field; Fiber optical CATV transmissions equipment, namely, electric light switches, optic fibers, fiber optic cables, network communication apparatus, namely, wired and wireless network interface devices, switching devices and gateways; Program-controlled switchboards, namely, automatic switchboards; Printed circuits; Integrated circuits; Chips in the nature of integrated circuits, namely, silicon chips and electronic chips for the manufacture of integrated circuits; Remote control apparatus, namely, remote control telemetering machines and apparatusSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 23, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 2, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 5, 2016CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
May 5, 2016CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 21, 2016CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 21, 2016CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 17, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 5, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 13, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 13, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 13, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 13, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 25, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 16, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 9, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 13, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 12, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 16, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 2, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 2, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance