USPTO serial 79023611
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
DE
67136 Fußgönheim, DE
67136 Fußgönheim, DE
67136 Fußgönheim, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William F. Herbert
WILLIAM F. HERBERT Staas & Halsey LLP1201 New York Ave., N.W.SUITE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ Car maintenance cleaning preparations and car cleaning preparations ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | [ Exhaust pipes for land vehicles ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | [ Land vehicles; vehicle structural parts; ] vehicle parts, namely, wheel rims, [ tires, ] wheels, light alloy wheels [, gearshift knobs, steering wheels, spoilers, luggage ] [ tacks ] [ * racks *, hub caps, hood ornaments, shock absorbers, brake systems ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | [ Business marketing and advertising; business management; business consulting ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | [ Lease-purchase financing; financing services ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | [ * Passenger * transport ] [ and freight ] [services, both by ship, truck, air, rail and bus ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | [ Metal treatment for vehicles and vehicle parts, namely, cutting, shaping, polishing, metal coating; material treatment for vehicles and vehicle parts, namely, metal shaping, glass polishing, and applying protective coatings to metal ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Design and development of vehicle parts and fittings ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2008 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |