Drawing for MASAI BAREFOOT TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 79023619

MASAI BAREFOOT TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3557631Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 6, 2009
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASAI BAREFOOT TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

COURTNEY JACKSON

COURTNEY JACKSON ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP7700 FORSYTH BLVD.SUITE 1800SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing of training, namely, instruction in and initiation into the method used for programming the motion-controlling center of the brain regulating our way of walking, pace and postureSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 19, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 8, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 8, 2015C.7CNEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Sep 3, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 19, 2015EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2015PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
Mar 24, 2015C.7FREQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED—
Mar 24, 2015AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Mar 24, 2015ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2015PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Jan 31, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 13, 201571AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Jan 13, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 8, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 28, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2010LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 15, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 6, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 21, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 17, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 9, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 25, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 18, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 31, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 18, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 18, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 17, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance