USPTO serial 79023645
NETNUMEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3392032Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 4, 2008
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NETNUMEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. Kayden
JAMES W. KAYDEN MCCLURE, QUALEY & RODACK, LLP3100 Interstate North CircleSuite 150ATLANTA, GA 30339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing apparatus in the nature of network management products, namely, software for transmission network management, software for mobile network management, software for network management for networks and data, software for network element layer uniform network management and software for integrated network management | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |