Drawing for CONTINENCE CONTROL SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 79023646

CONTINENCE CONTROL SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3554242Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 30, 2008
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONTINENCE CONTROL SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN J. STRAUSS

STEPHEN J. STRAUSS FULWIDER PATTON LLP6060 CENTER DRIVETENTH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90045

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS FOR TREATING INCONTINENCE, NAMELY, AN IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONSISTING OF IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATORS, REMOTE CONTROL UNITS, MEDICAL CATHETERS, MEDICAL AND SURGICAL BAGS, ENVELOPES AND RECEPTACLES, ALL FOR USE IN THE COLLECTION AND CONTROL OF FLUID AND SOLID EXCRETIONS AND THE EXCRETION OF FLUIDS AND SOLIDS FROM THE HUMAN BODYSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 15, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 15, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 3, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Mar 31, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 31, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 9, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 30, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 14, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 5, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 8, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 17, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 16, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance