Drawing for OÑAZ

USPTO serial 79023649

OÑAZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3359920Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 25, 2007
Examiner
LEWIS, MICHAEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with OÑAZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, namely, wood trituration machines; machines for aspiration, transport, storage and processing of sawdust for industrial useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 8, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 13, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 13, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 16, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 11, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Apr 11, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 11, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 22, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 22, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 30, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 4, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 31, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 4, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 25, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 22, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2006LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance