Drawing for MULTICAL

USPTO serial 79023652

MULTICAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3245173Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 22, 2007
Examiner
WILLISTON, JENNIFER LYNN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with MULTICAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Miriam D. Trudell

Miriam D. Trudell Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP3400 Walnut Street, Suite 700Denver, CO 80205United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004INDUSTRIAL LUBRICANTS FOR USE IN SIZING-MACHINES FOR THE CALIBRATION OF SINTERED METALSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 20, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 24, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 22, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 15, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 12, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 21, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 3, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 29, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 22, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 20, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 20, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 20, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 20, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 21, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 31, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 22, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 22, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance