USPTO serial 79023657
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
RENEO S.A.S.; DI PAGNANINI ISABELLA & C.
CIVITANOVA MARCHE (MC), IT
Other trademarks owned by RENEO S.A.S.; DI PAGNANINI ISABELLA & C.
RENEO S.A.S.; DI PAGNANINI ISABELLA & C.
CIVITANOVA MARCHE (MC), IT
Other trademarks owned by RENEO S.A.S.; DI PAGNANINI ISABELLA & C.
RENEO S.A.S.; DI PAGNANINI ISABELLA & C.
CIVITANOVA MARCHE (MC), IT
Other trademarks owned by RENEO S.A.S.; DI PAGNANINI ISABELLA & C.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN S. EGBERT
JOHN S EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES412 MAIN ST 7TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear namely boots, booties, sandals, shoes and slippers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2007 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |