USPTO serial 79023660
LOWLAND YACHTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOWLAND YACHTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Transportation means, means of transportation over water; yachts and parts therefor in as far as not included in other classes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Business intermediary services relating to the purchase and sale of the goods mentioned in class 12 | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Yacht building as well as the construction of other types of water vehicles; maintenance and repair of water vehicles and parts therefore; installation of apparatus in water vehicles; building and reparation | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 10, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |