USPTO serial 79023722
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta S. Bren
LOREDANA MANSI C/O METROCONSULT SRLPIAZZA CAVOUR, 3I NONE TO, 10060ITALY| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Vehicles, namely, motorized bicycles, motorcycles, motorized scooters, parts and accessories of said products, namely, wheels, consoles, windscreens, mudguards, vehicle body covers, tire chains, seat covers, windshield wipers, alarms, seat extenders, seat cushions, rear view mirrors, roller protectors for motorcycles, exhaust covers, fenders, windshields, passenger grab bars, luggage bracket sets, topcases for storage, topcase brackets, topcase backrests, saddlebags, traveling tank bags, tank bags, rear travel bags, luggage and topcase carriers, fuel tank covers, control level covers, bells, motorcycle covers, turn signal lamp sets for motorcycles, head lamp protectors, head lamp covers, engine guards, tire pumps | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 12, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |