Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 79023762?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/79023762. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns NANO FUSION?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 79023762, the listed owner(s) include: Heike Blum, Heike Blum, Coty Deutschland GmbH.

What is USPTO serial number 79023762?

Serial number 79023762 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark NANO FUSION. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover NANO FUSION?

The public record lists International Classes: 003. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: NANO FUSION Serial# 79023762 | status 402; last event DENA | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

Q: What is the current status of NANO FUSION?

NANO FUSION (79023762) currently shows USPTO status code 402 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANO FUSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
003	Soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, nail varnish, cosmetic hair lotions	ABANDONED	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Oct 22, 2016	DENA	NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED	—
Oct 21, 2016	DETH	DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION	—
Jun 12, 2009	FINT	FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB	—
May 12, 2009	FICS	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB	—
May 12, 2009	FICR	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
May 30, 2008	RFNT	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB	—
May 12, 2008	MAB4	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION	—
May 12, 2008	ABN4	ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION	—
May 12, 2008	OP.T	OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999	—
May 12, 2008	OP.S	OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999	—
Apr 4, 2008	OP.I	OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999	—
Apr 3, 2008	OPNS	OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB	—
Apr 3, 2008	OPNC	OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED	—
Mar 27, 2008	DCPN	CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB	—
Jan 7, 2008	ETOF	EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED	—
Dec 6, 2007	OPNX	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB	—
Dec 4, 2007	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2007	OPNS	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB	—
Nov 22, 2007	OPNR	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Nov 14, 2007	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Oct 30, 2007	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Oct 29, 2007	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Oct 24, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 24, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 24, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Apr 23, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Mar 21, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 21, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2006	RFNT	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB	—
Sep 21, 2006	RFCS	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB	—
Sep 21, 2006	RFRR	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU	—
Sep 20, 2006	RFCR	NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW	—
Sep 19, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 23, 2006	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—
Jun 22, 2006	REPR	SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB	—

NANO FUSION