Drawing for PAD

USPTO serial 79023831

PAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3389081Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 26, 2008
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007ENGINES, NOT FOR LAND VEHICLES; ELECTRIC MOTORS FOR MACHINES AND ELECTRIC STARTER MOTORS, NAMELY, DRIVING GEARSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009PROGRAMMABLE ELECTRICAL DRIVES FOR CONTROLLING MACHINES USED IN THE FIELD OF MEDICAL, AUTOMOTIVE AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, BUILDING SERVICES, ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION; LOW VOLTAGE AND MEDIUM VOLTAGE VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVES FOR CONTROL OF MOTORSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 28, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 11, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 3, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 3, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 30, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 26, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 22, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 6, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 25, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 25, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 27, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance