USPTO serial 79023852
COMPAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3392037Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 4, 2008
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with COMPAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Meri Entsorgungstechnik; für die Papierindustrie GmbH
81673 München, DE
Other trademarks owned by Meri Entsorgungstechnik; für die Papierindustrie GmbH
Meri Entsorgungstechnik; für die Papierindustrie GmbH
81673 München, DE
Other trademarks owned by Meri Entsorgungstechnik; für die Papierindustrie GmbH
Meri Environmental Solutions GmbH
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberto Ledesma
Roberto Ledesma Law Office of Roberto LedesmaPO Box 230692NEW YORK, NY 10023UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Industrial dewatering apparatus, namely, industrial dewatering machines for use in treatment of rejects and liquids including water, industrial effluent and sewage treatment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Meri Entsorgungstechnik; für die Papierindustrie GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Meri Entsorgungstechnik; für die Papierindustrie GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Meri Environmental Solutions GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named COMPAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 20, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 25, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 1, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 6, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |