USPTO serial 79023922
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOVAN N. JOVANOVIC
JOVAN N. JOVANOVIC THE WATSON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUP,3133 HIGHLAND DRIVESUITE 200HUDSONVILLE, MI 49426| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DATA PROCESSORS AND COMPUTER HARDWARE: KEYBOARDS WITH PROGRAMMABLE KEYS; INDUSTRIAL KEYBOARDS; CUSTOM KEYBOARDS; KEYBOARDS WITH ALPHANUMERIC KEYS, KEYBOARDS WITH AN X-Y MATRIX LAYOUT; WIRELESS CONTROLLER TO MONITOR AND CONTROL THE FUNCTION OF OTHER ELECTRONIC DEVICES; MINI TOUCH PADS; SMART CARD READERS; COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY, MODULES FOR HOLDING COMPUTER LOCKS, TRACKBALLS, POINTING DEVICES; ELECTRONIC CARD READER, MAGNETIC ENCODED CARD READER; COMPUTER TOUCHSCREENS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 14, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 1, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |