Drawing for S90

USPTO serial 79023923

S90

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3237675Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2007
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S90?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus

AIMEE L KAPLAN & STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Orthopedic footwear, namely, orthopedic shoes, boots, inner soles and orthopedic supports; implants consisting of artificial materialsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 2, 2022CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 8, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2022CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 26, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 5, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 17, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 23, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 3, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance