Drawing for FLAVOUR SHAKER

USPTO serial 79023928

FLAVOUR SHAKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3340144Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 20, 2007
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLAVOUR SHAKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norm J. Rich

FRANK B DEHN & CO ST BRIDE'S HOUSE10 SALISBURY SQLONDON, EC4Y 8JD UNITED KINGDOM,

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Non-electric grinding and blending apparatus for use in cooking; non-electric herb grinders and blenders; non-electric spice grinders and blenders; containers for non-electrical crushing and/or blending and/or grinding of cooking ingredients, none of the foregoing being mortars and pestlesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 14, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 24, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 6, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 27, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 13, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 29, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 20, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 17, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 7, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance