Drawing for ILK-ON

USPTO serial 79023930

ILK-ON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ILK-ON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Textiles and textile goods, not included in other classes; bed and table covers namely bath linen (except clothing); sleeping bags (sheeting), covers for cushions, bed blankets; traveling rugs, bed covers, bed spreads, linings, sheets, eiderdowns, mattress covers, washing mitts, pillow cases, bed linen, household linen, table linen not of paper, pillow shams, curtains of textile or plastic, duvet covers, contour sheets, top curtains, bolster covers, bed coverletsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 7, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 17, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 8, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 6, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 22, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 4, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance