USPTO serial 79023957
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
78315 Radolfzell, DE
78315 Radolfzell, DE
78315 Radolfzell, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David G. Boutell, Dale H. Thiel, Terryence F. Chapman, Mark L. Maki, Liane L. Churney, Brian R. Tumm, Steven R. Thiel, Donald J. Wallace and Sidney B. Williams, Jr.
DAVID G BOUTELL, DALE H THIEL, TERRYEN FLYNN, THIEL, BOUTELL & TANIS PC2026 RAMBLING RDKALAMAZOO, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Dispensers in the nature of dosers that count or measure dosage output for use with cosmetics and pharmaceutical products, not containing microprocessors, and parts thereof. | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Dispensers, atomizers, electric vaporizers for upper respiratory conditions, all for medical use, sold empty and not containing microprocessors; pump-action sprayers for administering topical, nasal and oral pharmaceuticals sold empty; medical sprayers for liquid medicines; single-use and dual-use medical or veterinary pumps for infusing, administering or delivering medications; pumps with cartridges for dispensing medicines and pharmaceutical or veterinary substances; medical sprayers for otolaryngology use; parts of all the above-named goods. | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Aerosol dispensers not for medical use and sold empty; portable fragrance dispensers for household use sold empty; perfume sprayers sold empty; dispensers for liquid soap, for gel, for lotion, for shampoo and for similar household products not made from metal and sold empty; parts of all the above-named goods, none of which contain microprocessors. | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |