Drawing for CLEAN & CLOSED

USPTO serial 79023957

CLEAN & CLOSED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3324791Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 30, 2007
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEAN & CLOSED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David G. Boutell, Dale H. Thiel, Terryence F. Chapman, Mark L. Maki, Liane L. Churney, Brian R. Tumm, Steven R. Thiel, Donald J. Wallace and Sidney B. Williams, Jr.

DAVID G BOUTELL, DALE H THIEL, TERRYEN FLYNN, THIEL, BOUTELL & TANIS PC2026 RAMBLING RDKALAMAZOO, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Dispensers in the nature of dosers that count or measure dosage output for use with cosmetics and pharmaceutical products, not containing microprocessors, and parts thereof.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
010Dispensers, atomizers, electric vaporizers for upper respiratory conditions, all for medical use, sold empty and not containing microprocessors; pump-action sprayers for administering topical, nasal and oral pharmaceuticals sold empty; medical sprayers for liquid medicines; single-use and dual-use medical or veterinary pumps for infusing, administering or delivering medications; pumps with cartridges for dispensing medicines and pharmaceutical or veterinary substances; medical sprayers for otolaryngology use; parts of all the above-named goods.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Aerosol dispensers not for medical use and sold empty; portable fragrance dispensers for household use sold empty; perfume sprayers sold empty; dispensers for liquid soap, for gel, for lotion, for shampoo and for similar household products not made from metal and sold empty; parts of all the above-named goods, none of which contain microprocessors.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 5, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 22, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 23, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 6, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 6, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 14, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 16, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 2, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 28, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance