Drawing for DAIWA

USPTO serial 79023966

DAIWA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3352570Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 11, 2007
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAIWA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAY P HINES

P JAY HINES Cantor Colburn LLP1800 Diagonal RoadSuite 510Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Rucksacks, shoulder bags, [ boston bags, ] carry-on bags, bags for packing in the nature of waterproof nylon bags for fishing that are not fitted to any particular fishing apparatus, [ purses not of precious metal ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 11, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 20, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 11, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 26, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 13, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Nov 19, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 19, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 1, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Nov 1, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 29, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 22, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 21, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 28, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2006CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jun 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance