USPTO serial 79023968
GIII
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4398167Status 708Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 10, 2013
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- —
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with GIII?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ee Ming T. Bahk
Ee Ming T. Bahk Oliff PLCP.O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GLOBERIDE, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GLOBERIDE, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GLOBERIDE, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Daiwa Seiko, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named GIII
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2026 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 23, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 25, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 7, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 9, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |