Drawing for DIGIPAK I-CREATE

USPTO serial 79023974

DIGIPAK I-CREATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3258924Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 3, 2007
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGIPAK I-CREATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Jennings

Patrick J. Jennings Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP2300 N Street, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Packagings made of cardboard; cardboard boxes; stickersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 3, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 20, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 20, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 20, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 7, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 3, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 27, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 27, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 17, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance