Drawing for TBR

USPTO serial 79024037

TBR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3288337Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 4, 2007
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with TBR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

John S. Egbert Egbert Law Offices, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical, medical and dental apparatus and instruments, namely, screw taps, surgical pilot drill bits, surgical drill bits with irrigation, surgical drill bit extensions, surgical drilling guides, circular surgical knives, surgical torque wrenches, surgical wrenches, surgical screwdrivers, all for use in dental implantology; apparatus and instruments for dental implantology, namely, dental implants, artificial teeth, dental screws for use in dental implantology, pins for artificial teeth for use in dental implantology, artificial teeth stumps, protection screws for use in dental implantology, stabilization clips for artificial teeth; surgical and prosthetic kits consisting primarily of dental screws and dental implants for use in dental implantologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 31, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 14, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 18, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 18, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 18, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 28, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 18, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 11, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 19, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 13, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 22, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance