Drawing for TRI ZONE TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 79024046

TRI ZONE TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3253958Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 19, 2007
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRI ZONE TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald C. Knapp, Jr.

Donald C. Knapp, Jr. BP AMERICA INC.150 West Warrenville RoadMail Code 200-1WNaperville, IL 60563

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Lubricants, namely, motorcycle lubricants; lubricating oil for motor vehicles; non-chemical additives for fuels and lubricantsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 19, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2016CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD—
Mar 28, 2016MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 28, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 28, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 27, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 19, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 3, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance