Drawing for CARLO ORSINI

USPTO serial 79024062

CARLO ORSINI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3228198Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 10, 2007
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARLO ORSINI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Miriam Richter

Miriam Richter RICHTER TRADEMARKS2312 WILTON DRWILTON MANORS, FL 33305-1249UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Goods namely, bracelets, necklaces, pendants, brooches, rings being jewelry, earrings [ and watches in precious metals or coated therewith; ] jewelry, [ precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 10, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 23, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Apr 30, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 30, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 30, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 10, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 26, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 30, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 10, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Feb 27, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 10, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 16, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 11, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Aug 8, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance