Drawing for ATOMIC LEVEL SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 79024071

ATOMIC LEVEL SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3376155Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 29, 2008
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATOMIC LEVEL SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart J. Bellus

Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for manufacturing semiconductors and structural parts thereforSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2021IRIVIRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 23, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 2, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 17, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Apr 17, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 17, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 26, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 26, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 26, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 8, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 23, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 14, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 29, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 10, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 7, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 7, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 17, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 15, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance