Drawing for FLEXTEC

USPTO serial 79024090

FLEXTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3352572Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 11, 2007
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLEXTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy Span Wergeles

Amy Span Wergeles Henkel CorporationLaw Department - TrademarksOne Henkel WayRocky Hill, CT 06067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals used in the manufacture of adhesives and sealants, namely, silane modified polymersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 20, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 13, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 13, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 22, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 10, 2015INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Jun 8, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 5, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 5, 2015REINREINSTATED—
Jun 5, 2015PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2015APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 30, 2015TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 18, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 2, 2013PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Dec 2, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 18, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Nov 18, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 29, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 6, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance