USPTO serial 79024090
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy Span Wergeles
Amy Span Wergeles Henkel CorporationLaw Department - TrademarksOne Henkel WayRocky Hill, CT 06067| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used in the manufacture of adhesives and sealants, namely, silane modified polymers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |