Drawing for MN MODEL NOVIAS

USPTO serial 79024095

MN MODEL NOVIAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TENG, SIMON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MN MODEL NOVIAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Franklin Rothwell

G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P..C.1425 K STREET, N.W.STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Ready-made clothing for women, namely, dresses, shawls, skirts, blouses, jackets, and party clothing only for womenSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 31, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 30, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 14, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 28, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 28, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 12, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 12, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 14, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 29, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 25, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 1, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 31, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance