USPTO serial 79024101
DIGELYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3280136Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 14, 2007
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIGELYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-92508 REUIL-MALMAISON Cedex, FR
F-92508 REUIL-MALMAISON Cedex, FR
F-92508 REUIL-MALMAISON Cedex, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia A. Wilczynski Brozek
PATRICIA A WILCZYNSKI BROZEK WILCZYNSKI BROZEK LAW40 PRESTON STPO BOX 1830HUNTINGTON, NY 11743Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Facilities and installations, mobile or fixed, for the chemical, biological, physical or physico-chemical (or lysis) breaking down of bacteria occuring in the biological treatment of urban or industrial wastewater and making up liquid and semi-liquid sludge derived from sewage plants; installations and apparatus, mobile or fixed, for the preparation, mixing, dosage and distribution of oxidizing chemical products, surface-active or enzyme products, designed for breaking down cell walls; water treatment and settling apparatus and installations, consisting of equipment used for reducing the production of biological sludge by methods involving chemical oxidizing reagents, surface-active agents, enzymes, radiation, electric fields, electron beams, mechanical comminution and shredding means or biological means of enzymatic hydrolysis or digestion, as well as a combination of two or several of these methods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Water and waste treatment of slurry from sewage plants; water and waste treatment in the nature of adjustment of physical and physio-chemical parameters for sludge from sewage plants by biological aerobic or anaerobic fermentation, dewatering, single and multistage digestion; water and waste treatment in the nature of transforming sludge from sewage plants with production of replacement fuels, compost, fertilizer, or growing media | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical research and consultation in the field of treating urban or industrial wastewater, in the field of techniques for reducing the production of sludge from installations for purifying municipal and industrial wastewater; technical audits, expert witness services and consultancy in connection with processes for treating urban wastewater and sludge treatment before spreading, sludge re-use, drying or incineration | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DEGREMONT
- Other trademarks owned by DEGREMONT
- Other trademarks owned by DEGREMONT
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DIGELYS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 26, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 29, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 3, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |