USPTO serial 79024135
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
COSTA CONCENTRADOS LEVANTINOS, S.A.
E-46290 ALCÃCER (Valencia), ES
Other trademarks owned by COSTA CONCENTRADOS LEVANTINOS, S.A.
COSTA CONCENTRADOS LEVANTINOS, S.A.
ES
Other trademarks owned by COSTA CONCENTRADOS LEVANTINOS, S.A.
COSTA CONCENTRADOS LEVANTINOS, S.A.
ES
Other trademarks owned by COSTA CONCENTRADOS LEVANTINOS, S.A.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Clarke Holman and Harvey B. Jacobson, Simor L. Moskowitz, Allen S. Melser, Michael R. Slobasky, Marsha G. Gentner , Jonathan L. Scherer, George W. Lewis, William E. Player, and Nathaniel A. Humphries
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Hazelnut milk, almond milk, non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit juices and vegetable juices, and concentrates, syrups, or powders used in the preparation of soft drinks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |